Connect with us

Uncategorized

What’s Next for Stablecoins? Clearinghouses

Published

on

With the expected passage of the GENIUS Act this week, the $260‑billion stablecoin market is on the cusp of becoming a formally regulated part of the U.S. financial system.

The next step is institutional, bringing the time‑tested model of clearinghouses into the world of tokenized money.

Why clearing matters

Traditional clearinghouses, formally called central clearing counterparties, stand between buyers and sellers, netting exposures, collecting collateral and mutualizing losses if a member defaults. That plumbing is mundane until something breaks; then, it becomes the firewall that prevents a localized shock from becoming a systemic risk. Recognizing the “too‑central‑to‑fail” profile of these utilities, the Financial Stability Board spent 2024 writing new global standards for their orderly resolution.

Enter stablecoins, at global scale.

They promise dollar‑for‑dollar redemption but trade on borderless blockchains where liquidity can evaporate in near real—time. Today each issuer is its own first and last line of defense; redemptions pile up exactly when asset markets are least forgiving. Stablecoin clearinghouses would pool that redemption risk, enforce real‑time margining, and give regulators a control panel for data and a toolbox for crisis intervention.

To be sure, many will think that clearinghouses are anathema to a decentralized financial system, but via the Genius Act, D.C. and Wall Street are sending signals for the stablecoin industry to follow.

Congress has already nudged us there

Buried in Section 104 of the GENIUS Act is a quiet endorsement of central clearing: stablecoin reserves may include short‑term Treasury repo only if the repo is centrally cleared (or if the counterparty passes a Fed‑style stress test).

That small clause plants a seed. Once issuers must interface with a clearinghouse for their own collateral management, extending the model to the tokens themselves is a short conceptual hop –especially as intraday settlement windows shrink from hours to seconds.

Wall Street sees the opportunity

The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) — the utility that processes $3.7 quadrillion of securities every year — confirmed in June that it is “assessing options” to issue its own stablecoin. Meanwhile, a consortium of the largest U.S. banks — backers of The Clearing House real‑time payments network — is exploring a joint bank‑backed stablecoin, explicitly citing their clearing expertise as a competitive advantage.

As either of these, or other yet to be publicly announced ventures, proceed forward, the risk‑management stack that they bring to market will likely become the dominant blueprint. (Bank of America and Citi have both said recently they want to issue their own stablecoins.)

New governance models are in motion

The Bank for International Settlements said this month that stablecoins still “fall short” of sound‑money tests and could trigger “fire sales” of reserves without robust guardrails. If a mammoth player were to join a clearinghouse and then falter, the default could dwarf margin funds, raising too‑big‑to‑bail questions for taxpayers. Governance will likely converge on a bespoke framework; designing a charter that satisfies international regulators eyeing cross‑border spillovers will require the kind of multilateral horse‑trading typical of Basel committees.

How a stablecoin clearinghouse would work

  1. Membership & capital – Issuers (and possibly major exchanges) would become clearing members, posting high‑quality collateral and paying default‑fund assessments just as futures brokers do today.
  2. Netting & settlement – The clearinghouse would maintain omnibus on‑chain accounts, netting bilateral flows into a single multilaterally netted position each block, then settling with finality by transferring stablecoins (or tokens representing reserve assets) between members.
  3. Redemption windows – If redemption queues spike beyond preset thresholds, the utility could impose pro‑rata payouts or auction collateral, slowing the bleed long enough for orderly asset sales.
  4. Transparency & data – Because every token transfer touches the clearinghouse’s smart contract, regulators would gain a real‑time, consolidated ledger of systemic exposures — something impossible in today’s fragmented pools.

Congress is codifying the reserve and disclosure rules. Wall Street is preparing the balance‑sheet heft. And global standard‑setters are already sketching the resolution playbooks.

CryptoExpect niche institutional use cases to dominate early — collateral mobility, overnight funding — resulting in intraday liquidity savings for institutions and a public‑good risk shield for the Fed. If crypto consortiums do not step in, TradFi-style clearinghouses will dominate the landscape.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Uncategorized

Wall Street Bank Citigroup Sees Ether Falling to $4,300 by Year-End

Published

on

By

Wall Street giant Citigroup (C) has launched new ether (ETH) forecasts, calling for $4,300 by year-end, which would be a decline from the current $4,515.

That’s the base case though. The bank’s full assessment is wide enough to drive an army regiment through, with the bull case being $6,400 and the bear case $2,200.

The bank analysts said network activity remains the key driver of ether’s value, but much of the recent growth has been on layer-2s, where value “pass-through” to Ethereum’s base layer is unclear.

Citi assumes just 30% of layer-2 activity contributes to ether’s valuation, putting current prices above its activity-based model, likely due to strong inflows and excitement around tokenization and stablecoins.

A layer 1 network is the base layer, or the underlying infrastructure of a blockchain. Layer 2 refers to a set of off-chain systems or separate blockchains built on top of layer 1s.

Exchange-traded fund (ETF) flows, though smaller than bitcoin’s (BTC), have a bigger price impact per dollar, but Citi expects them to remain limited given ether’s smaller market cap and lower visibility with new investors.

Macro factors are seen adding only modest support. With equities already near the bank’s S&P 500 6,600 target, the analysts do not expect major upside from risk assets.

Read more: Ether Bigger Beneficiary of Digital Asset Treasuries Than Bitcoin or Solana: StanChart

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

XLM Sees Heavy Volatility as Institutional Selling Weighs on Price

Published

on

By

Stellar’s XLM token endured sharp swings over the past 24 hours, tumbling 3% as institutional selling pressure dominated order books. The asset declined from $0.39 to $0.38 between September 14 at 15:00 and September 15 at 14:00, with trading volumes peaking at 101.32 million—nearly triple its 24-hour average. The heaviest liquidation struck during the morning hours of September 15, when XLM collapsed from $0.395 to $0.376 within two hours, establishing $0.395 as firm resistance while tentative support formed near $0.375.

Despite the broader downtrend, intraday action highlighted moments of resilience. From 13:15 to 14:14 on September 15, XLM staged a brief recovery, jumping from $0.378 to a session high of $0.383 before closing the hour at $0.380. Trading volume surged above 10 million units during this window, with 3.45 million changing hands in a single minute as bulls attempted to push past resistance. While sellers capped momentum, the consolidation zone around $0.380–$0.381 now represents a potential support base.

Market dynamics suggest distribution patterns consistent with institutional profit-taking. The persistent supply overhead has reinforced resistance at $0.395, where repeated rally attempts have failed, while the emergence of support near $0.375 reflects opportunistic buying during liquidation waves. For traders, the $0.375–$0.395 band has become the key battleground that will define near-term direction.

XLM/USD (TradingView)

Technical Indicators
  • XLM retreated 3% from $0.39 to $0.38 during the previous 24-hours from 14 September 15:00 to 15 September 14:00.
  • Trading volume peaked at 101.32 million during the 08:00 hour, nearly triple the 24-hour average of 24.47 million.
  • Strong resistance established around $0.395 level during morning selloff.
  • Key support emerged near $0.375 where buying interest materialized.
  • Price range of $0.019 representing 5% volatility between peak and trough.
  • Recovery attempts reached $0.383 by 13:00 before encountering selling pressure.
  • Consolidation pattern formed around $0.380-$0.381 zone suggesting new support level.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

HBAR Tumbles 5% as Institutional Investors Trigger Mass Selloff

Published

on

By

Hedera Hashgraph’s HBAR token endured steep losses over a volatile 24-hour window between September 14 and 15, falling 5% from $0.24 to $0.23. The token’s trading range expanded by $0.01 — a move often linked to outsized institutional activity — as heavy corporate selling overwhelmed support levels. The sharpest move came between 07:00 and 08:00 UTC on September 15, when concentrated liquidation drove prices lower after days of resistance around $0.24.

Institutional trading volumes surged during the session, with more than 126 million tokens changing hands on the morning of September 15 — nearly three times the norm for corporate flows. Market participants attributed the spike to portfolio rebalancing by large stakeholders, with enterprise adoption jitters and mounting regulatory scrutiny providing the backdrop for the selloff.

Recovery efforts briefly emerged during the final hour of trading, when corporate buyers tested the $0.24 level before retreating. Between 13:32 and 13:35 UTC, one accumulation push saw 2.47 million tokens deployed in an effort to establish a price floor. Still, buying momentum ultimately faltered, with HBAR settling back into support at $0.23.

The turbulence underscores the token’s vulnerability to institutional distribution events. Analysts point to the failed breakout above $0.24 as confirmation of fresh resistance, with $0.23 now serving as the critical support zone. The surge in volume suggests major corporate participants are repositioning ahead of regulatory shifts, leaving HBAR’s near-term outlook dependent on whether enterprise buyers can mount sustained defenses above key support.

HBAR/USD (TradingView)

Technical Indicators Summary
  • Corporate resistance levels crystallized at $0.24 where institutional selling pressure consistently overwhelmed enterprise buying interest across multiple trading sessions.
  • Institutional support structures emerged around $0.23 levels where corporate buying programs have systematically absorbed selling pressure from retail and smaller institutional participants.
  • The unprecedented trading volume surge to 126.38 million tokens during the 08:00 morning session reflects enterprise-scale distribution strategies that overwhelmed corporate demand across major trading platforms.
  • Subsequent institutional momentum proved unsustainable as systematic selling pressure resumed between 13:37-13:44, driving corporate participants back toward $0.23 support zones with sustained volumes exceeding 1 million tokens, indicating ongoing institutional distribution.
  • Final trading periods exhibited diminishing corporate activity with zero recorded volume between 13:13-14:14, suggesting institutional participants adopted defensive positioning strategies as HBAR consolidated at $0.23 amid enterprise uncertainty.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.