Connect with us

Uncategorized

The GENIUS Act Killed Yield-Bearing Stablecoins. That Might Save DeFi

Published

on

Congress may pass the most consequential crypto law of the decade this week while drawing a bright red line through one of DeFi’s murkiest gray areas: yield-bearing stablecoins.

At first glance, the GENIUS Act appears to be a straightforward regulatory win. It will finally grant over $120 billion in fiat-backed stablecoins a legal runway, establishing clear guardrails for what qualifies as a compliant payment stablecoin.

But dig into the details and it becomes clear this isn’t a broad green light. In fact, under the law’s rigorous requirements—segregated reserves, high-quality liquid assets, GAAP attestations—only about 15% of today’s stablecoins would actually make the cut.

More dramatically, the Act explicitly bans stablecoins from paying interest or yield. This is the first time U.S. lawmakers have drawn a hard line between stablecoins as payment instruments and stablecoins as yield-bearing assets. Overnight, it turns decades of crypto experimentation on its head, pushing DeFi to evolve or risk sliding back into the shadows.

A hard stop for yield-bearing stablecoins

For years, DeFi tried to have it both ways: offering “stable” assets that quietly generated returns, while dodging securities treatment. The GENIUS Act ends that ambiguity. Under the new law, any stablecoin paying yield, whether directly through staking mechanics or indirectly via pseudo-DeFi savings accounts, is now firmly outside the compliant perimeter. In short, yield-bearing stablecoins just got orphaned.

Congress frames this as a way to protect U.S. banks. By banning stablecoin interest, lawmakers hope to prevent trillions from fleeing traditional deposits, which underwrite loans to small businesses and consumers. Keeping stablecoins yield-free preserves the basic plumbing of the U.S. credit system.

But there’s a deeper shift underway. This is no longer just a compliance question. It’s a total rethink of collateral credibility at scale.

Treasuries and monetary reflexivity

Under GENIUS, all compliant stablecoins must be backed by cash and T-bills with maturities under 93 days. That effectively tilts crypto’s reserve strategy toward short-term U.S. fiscal instruments, integrating DeFi more deeply with American monetary policy than most people are ready to admit.

We’re talking about a market currently around $28.7 trillion in outstanding marketable debt. Concurrently, the stablecoin market exceeds $250 billion in circulation. Therefore, even if just half of that (about $125 billion) pivots into short-term Treasuries, it represents a substantial shift, pushing crypto liquidity directly into U.S. debt markets.

During normal times, that keeps the system humming. But in the event of a rate shock, those same flows could reverse violently, triggering liquidity crunches across lending protocols that use USDC or USDP as the so-called “risk-free leg.”

It’s a new type of monetary reflexivity: DeFi now moves in sync with the health of the Treasury market. That’s both stabilizing and a fresh source of systemic risk.

Why this could be the healthiest moment for DeFi

Here’s the irony: by outlawing stablecoin yield, the GENIUS Act might actually steer DeFi in a more transparent, durable direction.

Without the ability to embed yield directly into stablecoins, protocols are forced to build yield externally. That means using delta-neutral strategies, funding arbitrage, dynamically hedged staking, or open liquidity pools where risk and reward are auditable by anyone. It shifts the contest from “who can promise the highest APY?” to “who can build the smartest, most resilient risk engine?”

It also draws new moats. Protocols that embrace smart compliance, through embedding AML rails, attestation layers, and token flow whitelists, will unlock this emerging capital corridor and tap institutional liquidity.

Everyone else? Segregated on the other side of the regulatory fence, hoping shadow money markets can sustain them.

Most founders underestimate how quickly crypto markets reprice regulatory risk. In traditional finance, policy shapes the cost of capital. In DeFi, it will now shape access to capital. Those who ignore these lines will watch partnerships stall, listings vanish, and exit liquidity evaporate as regulation quietly filters out who gets to stay in the game.

The long view includes sharper lines, stronger systems

The GENIUS Act isn’t the end of DeFi, but it does end a certain illusion that passive yield could simply be tacked onto stablecoins indefinitely, without transparency or trade-offs. From here on out, those yields have to come from somewhere real, with collateral, disclosures, and rigorous stress tests.

That might be the healthiest pivot decentralized finance could make in its current state. Because if DeFi is ever going to complement, or even compete with, traditional financial systems, it can’t rely on blurred lines and regulatory gray zones. It has to prove exactly where the yield comes from, how it’s managed, and who bears the ultimate risk.

The GENIUS Act just made this law. And in the long run, that could be one of the best things to ever happen to this industry.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Uncategorized

Bitcoin Devs Float Proposal to Freeze Quantum-Vulnerable Addresses — Even Satoshi Nakamoto’s

Published

on

By

A new Bitcoin draft proposal wants to do what’s long been unthinkable: Freeze coins secured by legacy cryptography — including those in Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallets — before quantum computers can crack them.

That’s according to a new draft proposal co-authored by Jameson Lopp and other crypto security researchers, which introduces a phased soft fork that turns quantum migration into a ticking clock. Fail to upgrade, and your coins become unspendable.

That includes the roughly 1.1 million BTC tied to early pay-to-pubkey addresses, like those of Satoshi’s and other early miners.

“This proposal is radically different from any in Bitcoin’s history just as the threat posed by quantum computing is radically different from any other threat in Bitcoin’s history,” the authors explained as a motivation for the proposal. “Never before has Bitcoin faced an existential threat to its cryptographic primitives.”

“A successful quantum attack on Bitcoin would result in significant economic disruption and damage across the entire ecosystem. Beyond its impact on price, the ability of miners to provide network security may be significantly impacted,” they added.

The draft BIP outlined three phases:

Phase A: Banning sending funds to legacy ECDSA/Schnorr addresses, nudging users toward quantum-resistant formats like P2QRH. (Starts 3 years after BIP-360 implementation)

Phase B: Make all legacy signatures invalid at the consensus layer. Coins in quantum-vulnerable addresses become permanently frozen. (Kicks in 2 years after Phase A)

Phase C (optional): Introduce a recovery path for stuck coins using zero-knowledge proof of BIP-39 seed possession. This could be a hard or soft fork.

But Why Now?

Bitcoin’s cryptography has never faced an existential threat and still doesn’t, except pre-emptive ones that can possibly target early wallets. Researchers say quantum computers capable of breaking ECDSA may arrive as soon as 2027.

A May report by CoinDesk flagged a new study suggesting that breaking RSA encryption with quantum computers may require 20 times fewer resources than previously thought.

Although Bitcoin uses elliptic curve cryptography, it remains vulnerable to quantum attacks similar to those threatening RSA. Current quantum computers are not yet capable of breaking these encryption methods, but research is rapidly advancing.

Earlier in July, eight legacy Bitcoin wallets moved over $8.5 billion worth of ‘Satoshi-era’ bitcoin after 15 years of dormancy — sparking speculation, among some, about moving to wallets with improved security as

That’s the red line for Lopp and the team.

Around 25% of all bitcoin have exposed their public keys, meaning they’re vulnerable to a “Q-day” style attack. If attackers are patient, they could use quantum tools to quietly drain dormant wallets over time without tripping alarms.

“Quantum attackers could compute the private key for known public keys then transfer all funds weeks or months later, in a covert bleed to not alert chain watchers,” the draft proposal stated. “Q-Day may be only known much later if the attack withholds broadcasting transactions in order to postpone revealing their capabilities.”

The proposal is still in draft stage and has no BIP number yet. And it may be the only way Bitcoin survives a quantum future.

Read more: Is Crypto Ready for Q-Day?

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Eclipse Launches $ES Airdrop, Distributing 15% of Token Supply

Published

on

By

Eclipse, the layer 2 that combines technology from the Ethereum and Solana blockchains has gone live with an airdorp of its $ES token.

The team behind the network shared that the initial distribution will occur over the next 30 days.

According to a press release shared with CoinDesk, a total of 1 billion $ES tokens have been minted. Of the supply, 15% is allocated to an airdrop and liquidity provisions for core community members and developers who have supported the network from the start. 35% will support ecosystem growth and research and development, aimed to help scale the network.

Contributors will receive 19% of the supply, including team members,with a four year vesting period and three year lockup schedule. The remaining 31% is for early supporters and investors, who are subject to a three year lockup schedule in order to commit with Eclipse’s roadmap long-term.

The team also said that the $ES token serves several purposes on the network. It acts as the gas token for the Eclipse chain, and it also enables decentralized governance. Token holders will be able to vote on key protocol upgrades and fee structures, such as Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) redistribution rates. The team also emphasized that the token’s utility may evolve over time with its decentralized governance.

The eclipse network went live in November 2024, but not without some controversy. Neel Somani, Eclipse Labs’ co-founder and former CEO, was ousted from the company in May 2024 after he received some sexual misconduct allegations against him on X. Further controversy came in July when a CoinDesk investigation revealed that Somani had secretly allocated an outsize share of the $ES supply to a partner at Polychain. That deal with the Polychain partner no longer exists, a spokesperson at Eclipse previously told CoinDesk.

Read more: VC Darling Eclipse Finally Debuts Its Solana-Ethereum Blockchain Hybrid

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

XRP Ledger to Star in Ripple- Ctrl Alt Deal to Tokenize Dubai Real Estate

Published

on

By

Ripple has expanded its institutional custody services into the Middle East, partnering with UAE-based tokenization platform Ctrl Alt to support Dubai’s government-led real estate digitization initiative.

The deal, announced on Tuesday, will see Ctrl Alt use Ripple’s custody infrastructure to store tokenized property title deeds issued by the Dubai Land Department (DLD) on the XRP Ledger (XRPL).

Ripple’s technology will underpin the secure storage and lifecycle management of fractionalized real estate titles, which forms a key component of Ctrl Alt’s end-to-end infrastructure for asset tokenization.

Ctrl Alt recently became the first VASP in Dubai authorized to offer issuer-related services under the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), tying token issuance directly to on-chain custody.

The move comes amid growing momentum for cryptocurrencies in Dubai. Ripple was granted a license by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) earlier this year and has since launched partnerships with Zand Bank and Mamo, and secured approval for its RLUSD stablecoin within the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC).

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.