Connect with us

Uncategorized

Decentralized Infrastructure Allows America to Compete on AI—Greg Osuri

Published

on

AI is no longer an emerging technology. It’s here, and it’s becoming the bedrock of modern civilization. Just as electricity transformed the 20th century and the Internet transformed the 21st, AI is reshaping how we work, govern, and live. Soon, every major institution, from hospitals to the military, will integrate AI into their core operations, raising the stakes for the infrastructure that underpins it.

Despite this demand, our infrastructure isn’t keeping pace. In 2024, U.S. data centers used ~200 terawatt-hours of electricity, enough to power Thailand for a year. The same estimate holds that by 2028, AI power usage is predicted to reach between 165 and 326 terawatt-hours annually, enough to power 22% of U.S. households. AI workloads are pushing energy and compute systems well beyond their limits, creating an exponential demand that leaves our power grid lagging behind as it struggles to scale even incrementally.

This mismatch is more than a technical issue. As demand for AI ramps up, these bottlenecks in national energy supply and compute access will slow development across every sector, limiting its transformative potential.

The United States is leading, for now. But we are in a sprint, and China is gaining ground. Their DeepSeek model R1 rivals top-tier U.S. models. DeepSeek’s success proves that speed, scale and efficiency can radically shift the balance of global AI power. China’s AI push is well-funded, coordinated and strategic. If DeepSeek is any indication of China’s momentum, we are far behind them.

It won’t matter who leads in algorithms if the U.S. keeps treating infrastructure as an afterthought, because we’re on track to lose the platform war. The future of AI must be built on freedom, transparency, and trust, not surveillance and control. That is America’s edge—and to that we must prioritize the energy crisis it’s creating.

In this context, massive, centralized data centers are obsolete. They’re rigid, expensive, and confined to one geographic location. Even worse, they create single points of failure. If one power grid goes down or is overheated, an entire segment of the country is plunged into a technological dark age.

By contrast, decentralized systems free our potential, allowing American innovation to scale with agility. Smaller compute clusters can run near sources of localized renewable energy, such as solar, wind, or geothermal energy, or take advantage of underutilized compute power sitting idle in homes, campuses, and communities. Decentralized systems also better position American technology to survive in a world where threats are increasingly moving into the digital space. In times of crisis, or cyberattacks from nefarious actors, distributing compute across individual nodes ensures continuity, whereas centralized systems collapse.

The way forward

So what’s the path forward?

We start by incentivizing distributed infrastructure, making it easier and more profitable to build beyond hyperscale facilities. We fund federal research and development for distributed computing to accelerate innovation in the public and private sectors. To host edge computing powered by local clean energy, we open up federal land and institutions. And finally, we streamline support for next-generation energy sources like advanced nuclear grids, so the future grid can match the volume of AI energy demand.

Through this approach, we reduce permit delays and unleash the latent value in our nation’s underused assets, from rural substations to decommissioned industrial zones. Our energy crisis cannot be solved with a single fix. But taken together, these steps serve as a resilient model for America to lead in AI development.

This shift does much more than fix our energy bottleneck—it reshapes access. Developers can build independently of Big Tech without begging for compute. These infrastructure policies would level the field for smaller players to build and deploy advanced AI models, decentralizing opportunity itself.

AI is set to shape every society and sector it touches. But ultimately, whoever controls the foundation will determine which values guide that outcome. We can let foreign powers consolidate that foundation, outstripping our capacities to build and entrenching centralization, surveillance, and control. Or we can leverage America’s edge and develop our infrastructure at the pace with which energy demands to guarantee resilience, transparency and freedom.

If the U.S. wants to lead in AI, we must act decisively. We cannot rely on legacy systems or lethargic bureaucracy. We don’t need more studies or more panels. If we want to define the future on our terms, we need to build, and we need to build now.

Let’s get to work.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Uncategorized

Senate Agriculture’s Top Dem: Crypto Market Structure Effort Needs ‘Serious Changes’

Published

on

By

The Senate Agriculture Committee leapt into Congress’ negotiation over crypto’s market structure legislation with a hearing on Tuesday, and its ranking Democrat, Senator Amy Klobuchar, outlined the significant changes she’d like to see before she’d embrace the effort to set up digital assets regulations.

As the House potentially nears passage of its own market structure bill in the Digital Asset Markets Clarity Act (despite a procedural delay on Tuesday), Klobuchar’s committee will need to sign off on its own legislation. And any major changes she and other Democrats are willing to pursue as a party could stretch the legislative process much longer than the Sept. 30 deadline that Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott has set.

«We’re not going to be rolled here,» Klobuchar warned, calling for «some serious changes» to the regulatory proposals being discussed for U.S. crypto.

She suggested the bill needs to better nail down the funding of regulators that’ll be tapped to oversee the rapidly growing new markets, should make a strong effort to protect consumers and needs to close off loopholes that you could «drive a truck through,» referring to the potential that existing securities regulations could be undermined.

The committee’s Republican chairman, John Boozman, highlighted collaboration with the Banking Committee and regulators. So far, the other committee is outpacing his in working on legislation. The Republicans there have publicly released a set of principles they’re following on the bill, though they haven’t yet released a working draft.

«We must act expeditiously to develop a comprehensive regulatory framework for the trading of digital commodities, but we must ensure we get this right,» Boozman said.

While the Democrats are not in charge, many of their votes will be needed to clear the Senate’s 60-vote hurdle for most legislation. Similar policy desires have also been expressed by Senator Elizabeth Warren, Klobuchar’s Democrat counterpart in the Senate Banking Committee, though crypto-critic Warren is unlikely to become a partner in the negotiation. Klobuchar’s panel, though, has historically been more collaborative than Warren’s.

On the major Senate vote on stablecoin legislation, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, Klobuchar was a no vote. Crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto has given Klobuchar an «F» rating for being against the industry.

Read More: House’s Crypto Markets Bill on Track, But Some in Industry Hope For Senate Overhaul

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Legitimate Privacy Tool or Dirty Money ‘Laundromat’? Lawyers Debate Role of Tornado Cash on Day 1 of Roman Storm Trial

Published

on

By

NEW YORK — There is at least one fact that both the defense and the prosecution agree in the ongoing criminal money laundering trial of software developer Roman Storm: the product he helped to create and run — a once-popular crypto privacy tool called Tornado Cash — was exploited by hackers and cyber criminals to launder their dirty money.

What the parties do not agree on, and the fundamental question at the heart of Storm’s trial, is whether Storm was able to prevent this behavior, whether he knew which criminals were using the Tornado Cash protocol and how and, most importantly, whether he should be held criminally liable for creating a tool that bad actors used to cover their tracks.

Storm, 36, has been charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions, and conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business — charges which, if Storm is convicted, carry a maximum combined sentence of 45 years in prison. His trial kicked off in Manhattan on Monday, and opening arguments took place Tuesday afternoon after lawyers selected a 12-person jury to oversee the three-week trial.

Read more: Jury Seated for Tornado Cash Dev Roman Storm’s Trial

During the government’s opening statements, prosecutor Kevin Mosley told the jury that Roman Storm “knew that his business was laundering dirty money” and that he made millions of dollars doing it. Mosley said the jury would see a photo of Storm wearing a t-shirt with a picture of a washing machine with Tornado Cash’s logo on it — evidence that he allegedly knew exactly what Tornado Cash was being used for.

Storm, Mosley said, turned a blind eye to the hackers using his platform and ignored pleas from scam victims who reached out to him, asking for help recovering their money. Though prosecutors claim Storm either told the victims he couldn’t help them or ignored them entirely, Mosley said Storm maintained full control over the Tornado Cash platform, even tweaking it “to make it even better for criminals to hide their money.”

Some of Tornado Cash’s users included North Korea’s infamous state-sponsored hacking organization, the Lazarus Group, which used Tornado Cash to launder the proceeds of its 2022 hack of Axie Infinity’s Ronin Network. Mosley told the jury that, by allegedly facilitating the Lazarus Group’s money laundering, Storm and his “co-conspirators” — fellow developers Alexey Pertsev and Roman Semenov — violated U.S. sanctions against North Korea. Mosley said Storm knew Tornado Cash was helping North Korea skirt U.S. sanctions because he allegedly texted Semenov and Pertsev, “guys, we’re done for” after news of the Axie Infinity hack broke.

Storm’s lawyers, of course, see the facts of the case very differently. In her opening statements to the jury, Keri Axel, a partner at Waymaker LLP, said that Storm’s text to Pertsev and Semenov after the Axie Infinity hack had nothing to do with sanctions, and everything to do with the impact of the hack on Tornado Cash’s reputation, as well as the price of the TORN token, which suffered in the wake of the hack. The washing machine t-shirt, she said, was a joke “in poor taste.”

Storm, Axel said, didn’t work with hackers or scammers, and didn’t want them using his product.

“These criminals, acting without any assistance from Roman [Storm], misused Tornado Cash,” Axel said. “You will not see any evidence that he communicated with them or assisted them, absolutely none.” The fact that Tornado Cash was continuously exploited by bad actors “ultimately killed his dream” of creating a privacy tool that was widely adopted and respected throughout the crypto community, Axel said.

It is privacy — and the legitimate need and desire for it — that sits at the core of Storm’s defense. His lawyers told the jury that their client, a Kazakhstan-born U.S. citizen who taught himself to code while working odd jobs as a bus boy and a security guard before jumping to the tech industry, was inspired to create a privacy tool after meeting Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, who she described to the jury as a “crypto rockstar.”

While Axel admitted that Tornado Cash was “misused” by bad actors, she said that they represented a minority of the tool’s users — most of whom she said were normal people using Tornado Cash to preserve their privacy.

“It’s not a crime to make a useful thing that’s misused by bad people,” Axel said, comparing Tornado Cash to a smart phone used to scam people, or a hammer used to break into homes.

She explained to the jury that, because the blockchain is public and easily searchable, any known wallet address can be searched, and its transactions (and the value of its contents) can be viewed by anyone. Axel explained that, in the crypto industry, loss of privacy has led to the recent string of kidnappings and attacks on high-net worth individuals and executives.

“How would you feel if someone took your bank account and published it on the internet?” Axel asked the jury. “You would feel exposed and probably unsafe.”

Axel told the jury that they would hear testimony from a host of victims and hackers, none of which could be directly connected to Roman Storm. The hackers, she said, were only testifying “in the hopes that they can get leniency in their own criminal cases” and that Storm lacked the power to help their victims.

First witness

After opening statements concluded, the government called its first witness, a Taiwan-born Georgia resident named Hanfeng Ling. Ms. Ling told the court how she was the victim of a pig butchering scam in the fall of 2021, that began with a wrong-number Whatsapp message. The scammer convinced Ling to transfer nearly $200,000 from her savings account to purchase crypto and then “invest” the crypto in a fake foreign exchange trading platform.

Ms. Ling’s testimony will continue on Wednesday. Nathan Rehn, the lead prosecutor, told the court that he expects her testimony will be followed by four more government witnesses on Wednesday.

The bulk of Storm’s trial is expected to take place over three weeks, followed by jury deliberation.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Gaming Studio Snail Explores Developing U.S. Dollar Stablecoin

Published

on

By

Snail Games (SNAL), a publicly-traded video game studio, said on Tuesday that it is mulling the development of its own U.S. dollar stablecoin.

The company is evaluating the technical, legal, and financial hurdles to issuing a proprietary stablecoin, according to a press release. To support the effort, Snail retained George Cao, founder of the crypto exchange AscendEX, as an external consultant. The company has also engaged a crypto-focused law firm to help navigate compliance challenges.

No firm timeline has been set, and the initiative remains exploratory.

The stock jumped as much as 20% on the news before shedding some of the gains, closing the session 8% higher.

«This stablecoin exploration is a natural evolution of our innovation-led strategy and will support a broader effort to evaluate how blockchain-based technologies could be aligned with the company’s long-term goal to be at the forefront of digital transformation in the entertainment space,” co-CEO Hai Shi said in a statement.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, and are increasingly popular to transfer value quickly and with fewer intermediaries through blockchain rails. With impending U.S. regulation of the sector, major banks and large retailers like Walmart and Amazon are said to explore issuing stablecoins.

For a company like Snail, integrating stablecoins could open doors to blockchain-based game economies, player-driven marketplaces or cross-border monetization, without relying on traditional payment rails.

Read more: ‘Crypto Week’ Hits a Roadblock as House Cancels Makeup Vote for Crypto Bills

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.