Connect with us

Uncategorized

A Vanishing $212M Bitcoin Order Caused Chaos for Traders. Is Spoofing Back in Crypto?

Published

on

On April 14, someone put in a sell order for 2,500 bitcoin, worth roughly $212 million, on the Binance order book at $85,600, around 2-3% above the spot prices trading at the time.

Seeing such a large order, the bitcoin price started to gravitate to this level at around 17:00 UTC.

Suddenly, the order was gone, as seen using Coin Glass data, which caused a brief moment of market apathy as bulls and bears tussled to fill a void in liquidity.

The bitcoin price at the time, however, was already on shaky ground due to geopolitical concerns. Subsequently, it went lower after the vanishing order caused chaos for the traders.

So what happened?

One answer could be an illegal technique that involves placing a large limit order to rile trading activity and then removing the order once the price comes close to filling it. This is called «order spoofing,» defined by the 2010 U.S. Dodd-Frank Act as «the illegal practice of bidding or offering with the intent to cancel before execution.»

Coinglass liquidity heat map before spoofed order was pulled (CoinGlass)

As seen in the liquidity heatmap in the image above, on the surface, the order with a price of $85,600 seemed like a key area of resistance, which is why market prices started to gravitate towards it. However, in reality, that order and liquidity were likely spoofed, giving traders the illusion of a stronger market.

Liquidity heatmaps visualize an order book on an exchange and show how much of an asset rests on the book at each price point. Traders will use a heatmap to identify areas of support and resistance or even to target and squeeze under-pressure positions.

In this particular case, the trader seemed to have placed a possible spoof order when the U.S. equity market was closed, usually a time period of low liquidity for the 24/7 bitcoin market. The order was then removed when the U.S. market opened as the price moved towards filling it. This could still have had the desired effect, as, for instance, a large order on one exchange might spur traders or algorithms on another exchange to remove their order, creating a void in liquidity and subsequent volatility.

Coinglass liquidity heat map after spoofed order was pulled (CoinGlass)

Another reason could be that the trader placing a $212 million sell order on Binance wanted to create short-term sell pressure to get filled on limit buys, and then they removed that order once those buys were filled.

Both options are plausible, albeit still illegal.

‘Systemic Vulnerability’

Former ECB analyst and current managing director of Oak Security, Dr. Jan Philipp, told CoinDesk that manipulative trading behavior is a «systemic vulnerability, especially in thin, unregulated markets.»

«These tactics give sophisticated actors a consistent edge over retail traders. And unlike TradFi, where spoofing is explicitly illegal and monitored, crypto exists in a gray zone.»

He added that «spoofing needs to be taken seriously as a threat as it helped trigger the 2010 Flash Crash in traditional markets, which erased almost $1 trillion in market value.»

Binance, meanwhile, insists that it is playing its part in preventing market manipulation.

«Maintaining a fair and orderly trading environment is our top priority and we invest in internal and external surveillance tools that continuously monitor trading in real-time, flagging inconsistencies or patterns that deviate from normal market behavior,» a Binance spokesperson told CoinDesk, without directly addressing the case of the vanishing $212 million order.

The spokesperson added that if anyone is found manipulating markets, it will freeze accounts, report suspicious activity to regulators, or remove bad actors from its platform.

Crypto and spoofing

Spoofing, or a strategy that mimics a fake order, is illegal, but for a young industry such as crypto, history is rife with such examples.

During 2014, when there was little to no regulatory oversight, the majority of trading volume took place on bitcoin-only exchanges from retail traders and cypherpunks, opening the industry to such practices.

During 2017’s ICO phase, when trading volume skyrocketed, tactics such as spoofing were also expected, as institutions were still skeptical about the asset class. In 2017 and 2018, traders regularly placed nine-figure positions that they had no intention of filling, only to pull the order shortly after.

BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes said in a 2017 blog post that he «found it incredible» that spoofing was illegal. He argued that if a smart trader wanted to buy $1 billion of BTC, they would bluff a $1 billion sell order to get it filled.

Bitcoin trading volume pre-2017 was non-existent (Bitcoinity)

However, since the 2021 bull market, the crypto market has experienced waves of institutional adoption, such as Coinbase (COIN) going public, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) going all-in on bitcoin, and BlackRock launching exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

At the time of writing, there are no such large orders that indicate further spoofing attempts, and spoofing attempts have seemed to have become less blatant. However, even with billions traded by TradFi firms, examples of such a strategy still exist across many crypto exchanges, particularly on low-liquidity altcoins.

For example, last month, cryptocurrency exchange MEXC announced that it had reined in a rise in market manipulation. An internal investigation found a 60% increase in market manipulation attempts from Q4 of 2024 to this first quarter of this year.

In February, a trader manipulated the HyperLiquid JELLY market by tricking a pricing oracle, and HyperLiquid’s response to the activity was met with skepticism and a subsequent outflow of capital.

How does the crypto market combat spoofing?

The burden ultimately lies with the exchanges and regulators.

«Regulators should set the baseline,» Dr. Jan Philipp told CoinDesk.» [Regulators] should define what counts as manipulation, specify penalties and outline how platforms must respond.»

The regulators have certainly tried to clamp down on such schemes. In 2020, rogue trader Avi Eisenberg was found guilty of manipulating decentralized exchange Mango Markets in 2022, but the cases have been few and far between.

However, crypto exchanges must also «step up their surveillance systems» and use circuit breakers while employing stricter listing requirements to clamp down on market manipulation, Philipp said.

«Retail users won’t stick around if they keep getting front-run, spoofed and dumped on. If crypto wants to outgrow its casino phase, we need infrastructure that rewards fair participation, not insider games,» Philipp concluded.

Read more: Crypto Traders Apparently Spam Truth Terminal Into Pumping Coin Associated With Brian Armstrong’s Dog

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Uncategorized

Stagflationary Data Puts Pressure on Bitcoin, Stocks Early in U.S. Day

Published

on

By

What one hour ago was looking like another positive day in markets has turned decidedly negative as the latest economic data fueled growing stagflation fears.

First up was ADP jobs numbers for April. Coming two days ahead of the government’s own employment data for April, the ADP report showed just 62,000 private sector jobs created this month, well shy of estimates for 108,000 and March’s 147,000. It was the weakest print since July 2024.

Next was the government’s first estimate of first quarter GDP growth, which came in at negative 0.3% against estimates for positive 0.2%. While the quarter ended in March, economic actors — fully aware of coming tariffs — front-loaded imports early in the year. Going back to Econ 101, rising imports (absent a corresponding gain in exports) are a drag on GDP growth.

Indeed, the export-import imbalance cut GDP growth by nearly 5% in the first quarter. Also at work was the Trump administration’s DOGE efforts, with government spending a drag on GDP for the first time since 2022.

Turning to inflation, the Core PCE price index embedded within the GDP report rose 3.5% versus estimates for a gain of just 3.1%.

It’s all adding up to a big drop in U.S. stocks, with the Nasdaq lower 2% and S&P 500 by 1.5%. That’s hitting bitcoin (BTC), which has slipped about 1% alongside to $94,300.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Trump’s Crypto Sherpa Bo Hines Says Crypto Legislation on Target for Quick Completion

Published

on

By

Strategists for two U.S. bills meant to create an oversight regime for crypto are setting out plans this week to pass legislation in the summer, Bo Hines, the White House official at the center of those efforts, told CoinDesk.

Hines, who President Donald Trump hired as executive director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets, told CoinDesk in an interview that the procedures are being ironed out to move legislation on regulating stablecoin issuers, and the crypto advocates in the White House and Congress will quickly pivot to the bigger bill that will set a full regulatory regime for U.S. crypto markets.

The progress so far puts the efforts «well on pace to achieve what the President desires,» he said, which is that both crypto bills reach Trump’s desk for signatures before Congress takes its summer recess in August.

The president’s adviser, who is a speaker at Consensus 2025 in Toronto May 14-16, said the bills to regulate stablecoin issuers that are moving through the Senate and House of Representatives are «90% aligned,» so it won’t be a difficult task to bring them together into a unified approach that would still need approval in both chambers.»We’re in the process of mitigating any differences between the two chambers there, but we feel like, you know, we’re in a really good spot to get that passed and signed into law,» he said. «It lays the foundation for everything that we can do.»

He said the more complex undertaking to write laws for how the U.S. should police the overall markets should emerge in draft bills «in the next few weeks.»

Trump’s business

While Congress is moving unusually fast, the president’s own crypto business interests have been criticized by Democrats who accuse Trump of improperly benefiting from his own policies and of inviting foreign influence from investors in his family’s projects. Trump’s interests include stakes in World Liberty Financial and the president’s own memecoin, $TRUMP. Hines pushed back, saying the rise of crypto has presented attractive innovations for investors.

«Any good business person would engage in a marketplace opportunity like that,» he said. «So, you know, I don’t view it as being detrimental in any capacity whatsoever.»

The president and his family have the «ability to engage with any marketplace that they see fit,» Hines said.

«We’re narrowly focused on just doing what’s in the best interest of the United States to make the U.S. the crypto capital world, usher in the golden age of digital assets, and we have our binders on to everything else,» he said. «That’s what the president’s asked us to do, and we’re going to deliver on his wishes.»

The White House official, 29, is known as a staunch loyalist to Trump, who had endorsed the former college football player in the first of his two unsuccessful North Carolina congressional campaigns. Despite his relative inexperience in the crypto field, Trump elevated Hines to a senior White House role to work beside crypto czar David Sacks and act as a «sherpa between White House policy, interagency activity, industry and what’s happening on Capitol Hill,» as Hines described it.

«We move at a speed that no other administration has ever been able to move before,» Hines noted.

Bitcoin reserve

Many in the digital assets industry had clamored for a digital assets reserve at the federal level, though the idea for how to approach it varies widely. Trump’s campaign-trail promises surged toward reality in March when he ordered his administration to start work on a bitcoin (BTC) reserve and a separate stockpile of other crypto assets.

One point of disappointment for those who’d wished for it was that Trump insisted the reserve be budget-neutral, meaning no new taxpayer money would go toward acquiring assets for the reserve.

Hines has been a prominent booster of this effort. He said the Treasury-led audit of U.S. crypto holdings, which needs to be done to find out the extent of assets (so far unmeasured) that’ll be directed into the stockpiles, is progressing quickly. The Treasury Department is now going through audit reports from various corners of the U.S. government, he said.

Trump had directed his administration to work out ideas for how to add even more to the funds without tapping taxpayers, and Hines said they’re still «fleshing out the best ideas.»

«I don’t think there’s going to be one single resolution where we say, ‘This is the path that we’re going.’ I think there could be multiple ways in which we engage in this,» Hines said, «We view bitcoin as digital gold, and we want to accumulate as much as we can.»

He didn’t have a timeline in mind for when the first tokens will begin stacking up as a longterm U.S. government investment.

Diverse views

The transition from President Joe Biden to Trump’s administration has been stark for the industry — until recently a target of government suspicion and now celebrated as an innovative movement that should be fostered. Already, regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission have reversed policies and started crypto roundtables behind doors that had been largely closed to digital assets discussions. And Trump himself held a crypto summit in the room of the White House where state dinners are hosted.

«We move at a speed that no other administration has ever been able to move before,» Hines noted.

Hines said he’s had as many as 200 meetings with crypto insiders in his short stint in the government, and he granted that their opinions can range widely. But he thinks the industry is largely aligned where it needs to be as Congress and regulators are considering its U.S. future.

When asked about some industry concerns about splitting the crypto legislation into two rather than a combined, single effort to improve its odds, he said details could still be worked out, though he’s currently focused on a stablecoin bill being quickly followed by market-structure legislation.

The crypto push, which he said «some will portray as being a chaotic process,» looks that way because that’s always the case in government policymaking «when you’re attempting to effectuate change.»

«We’re talking about revolutionizing a financial marketplace which has basically been archaic for the last three decades,» he said. «I just think that people should be very excited about what’s to come.»

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

CoinDesk 20 Performance Update: Index Declines 2% as Nearly All Assets Trade Lower

Published

on

By

CoinDesk Indices presents its daily market update, highlighting the performance of leaders and laggards in the CoinDesk 20 Index.

The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 2733.26, down 2.0% (-57.08) since 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday.

One of 20 assets is trading higher.

9am CoinDesk 20 Update for 2025-04-30: chart

Leaders: POL (+0.2%) and BTC (-0.6%).

Laggards: AAVE (-4.7%) and XRP (-4.0%).

The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index traded on multiple platforms in several regions globally.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.