Connect with us

Uncategorized

Hyperliquid Loses $4M After Whale’s Over $200M Ether Trade Unwinds

Published

on

The liquidation of an over $200 million long trade on ether (ETH) lead to a $4 million loss for Hyperliquid, where the «whale» placed the bet.

The liquidation saw wallet ‘0xf3f4’ opening a highly leveraged 50x long ETH position, depositing $4.3 million USDC as margin for a total size of 113,000 ETH.

The wallet then started withdrawing funds, reducing the margin below maintenance requirements in a move that resulted in a $1.8 million profit for the user but a $4 million loss for Hyperliquid’s Hyperliquid Provider (HLP) vault.

Vaults are a blockchain-based product on Hyperliquid where users can deposit USDC to potentially earn a share of profits generated by trading strategies of other users or the vault’s owner.

The moves created speculation among Hyperliquid users of a possible exploit of the platform, a rumor it doused in an X post.

“There was no protocol exploit or hack,” Hyperliquid said. “This user had unrealized PNL, withdrew, which lowered their margin, and was liquidated. They ended with ~$1.8M in PNL. HLP lost ~$4M over the past 24h. HLP’s all-time PNL remains at ~$60M. As a reminder, HLP is not a risk-free strategy.”

Hyperliquid added that it will update the maximum leverage for bitcoin (BTC) and ETH to 40x and 25x, respectively, to increase maintenance margin requirements for larger positions as a preventive measure for similar moves in the future.

Hyperliquid’s HLP vault still has an all-time profit of $60 million, data shows. Meanwhile, the platform’s HYPE token dropped from $14 to under $13 in a knee-jerk move after the liquidation, though it has since fully recovered the brief slide as of late Asian hours.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Uncategorized

SEC ‘Earnest’ About Finding Workable Crypto Policy, Commissioners Say at Roundtable

Published

on

By

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The staff at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has embraced the chance to finally work with the crypto industry to hash out policy for overseeing digital assets transactions, said Commissioner Hester Peirce, the head of the agency’s crypto task force.

The securities regulator is ready «to seek earnestly to find a workable framework,» Peirce said at the agency’s first crypto-focused roundtable on Friday. «I think we’re ready for the spring ahead,» she said, referring to the title of the day’s event, the «Spring Sprint Toward Crypto Clarity.»

The task, according to Peirce: «Can we translate the characteristics of a security into a simple taxonomy that will cover the many different types of crypto assets that exist today and may exist in the future?»

Mark Uyeda, the agency’s acting chairman, told reporters that despite recent SEC policy statements that certain areas of the crypto sector aren’t subject to securities laws — memecoins and mining, so far — it’s a «definitely possibility» that others will be defined as securities.

«We’re moving on multiple tracks here,» he said in answer to a question from CoinDesk. Each statement issued so far «ultimately is a staff statement» that doesn’t have legal backing, but he said the roundtable represents the entire commission — currently three members — looking at what a «potential commission interpretation might look like.»

In his opening remarks at the event, Uyeda, who was appointed by President Donald Trump as the SEC awaits a Senate confirmation of Paul Atkins, argued that the agency should have been more willing in recent years to make such interpretations public.

«When judicial opinions have created uncertainty from our participants in the past, the commission and its staff have stepped in to provide guidance,» Uyeda said. «This approach of using common rulemaking for explaining the commission’s process or releases rather than enforcement actions, should have been considered for classifying crypto assets under the federal security laws.»

Panel discussion

The panel discussion saw a dozen securities attorneys in the crypto sector weigh in on the specific issues they saw as they advised companies.

«What’s the biggest question that you face in trying to wrestle with this question?,» moderator Troy Paredes, a former SEC commissioner who now runs consulting firm Paredes Strategies, asked Sarah Brennan, the general counsel at Delphi Ventures and one of the 11 panelists.

«The specter of the application of securities laws has moved early-stage projects in the market to sort of take an arc very similar to [initial public offerings], where they stay private longer,» she replied.

«These assets in the traditional model are designed to have wide, broad early distribution and most of the market is hedging that on the application of securities laws, so it ends up looking a lot like your traditional markets where people will marshal their way to an exchange listing without that broad dissemination or price support or actually fully launching the technology.»

The panel featured critics of the industry alongside attorneys who have worked to develop the sector.

«Whether you’re talking yield farms or ostrich farms or orange groves, the whole point of securities regulation was to wrap that all up into a very big, broad, principles-based regulation,» former SEC attorney John Reed Stark said. His concern is that, even in 2025, much of the market lacks utility.

«If it all went away tomorrow and you weren’t speculating in it, you wouldn’t care,» he said.

Legislator questions

Ahead of the roundtable, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Jake Auchincloss, both Massachusetts Democrats, wrote an open letter to Uyeda asking about the SEC’s staff statement on memecoins and how it was developed.

The letter asked whether anyone at the SEC communicated with the White House about the statement, whether the White House’s crypto working group had directed the SEC to do anything and why the staff statement was not built into formal rulemaking.

Warren and Auchincloss also asked the SEC to explain how it would specifically define memecoins as distinct from «general cryptocurrency,» how it would distinguish between actual memecoins and memecoins that don’t meet the staff statement, and which memecoins the SEC analyzed in drafting its staff statement.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Coinbase Could Be Near Multi-Billion Dollar Deal for Deribit: Bloomberg

Published

on

By

Animal spirits in the crypto industry continue to be evident amid the eased regulatory stance of the Trump administration, with leading U.S. spot exchange Coinbase (COIN) in advanced acquisition talks with leading global derivatives exchange Deribit, reports Bloomberg.

According to the story, the companies have notified Dubai regulators (where Deribit is licensed) about the discussions.

Bloomberg earlier this year — alongside rumors that Kraken was discussing an acquisition of Deribit — reported Deribit could be valued in the area of $4 billion to $5 billion.

Mostly known for its spot trading business, Coinbase (COIN) would be making a big push into the highly profitable crypto derivatives market with a purchase of Deribit, which saw trading volume in 2024 of nearly $1.2 trillion — almost double that of the year prior.

Earlier this week, another U.S. crypto exchange — Kraken — boosted its derivatives business with a $1.5 billion deal to purchase Ninja Trader.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

South Korea Plans Sanctions Against BitMEX, KuCoin, Others: Report

Published

on

By

South Korean financial authorities are planning sanctions against crypto exchanges who are operating illegally in the country, business newspaper Hankyung reported on Friday.

The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) classified a number of exchanges who are not registered as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as targets for sanctions, according to the report.

The exchanges targeted — BitMEX, KuCoin, CoinW, Bitunix and KCEX — have been found to be operating Korean-language websites without reporting to FIU. For that reason, they are classed as illegal businesses, as per the country’s regulations.

«We are currently reviewing blocking access to unreported overseas exchanges that are providing services to domestic investors through consultation with the Korea Communications Standards Commission,» an FIU official said, accordinh to the report.

«We are organizing damage cases and related data to strengthen communication between authorities, and we expect to see tangible measures taken within this year.»

BitMEX, KuCoin and CoinW did not respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment.

Last month, South Korean crypto exchange Upbit was prohibited from allowing new customers to transfer assets to its platform for three months due to non-compliance with its obligations as a regulated provider.

Read More: Crypto Exchange Bithumb Raided by South Korean Prosecutors Over Embezzlement Allegations: Report

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.