Uncategorized
Will Argentinian President Milei’s Crypto ‘Fiasco’ be a Deathblow for Memecoin Craze?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1ba6/c1ba6e2f52aef870342d0a809031c72d57a44325" alt=""
The latest frenzy that started with U.S. President Donald Trump’s TRUMP memecoin launch and saw traders making and losing millions within minutes, might have finally come crashing down with the LIBRA token fiasco.
LIBRA, a Solana-based project that President of Argentina Javier Milei tweeted about on Feb. 14, saw its market cap rise as high as $4.5 billion and then fall more than 80% within a couple of hours as insiders cashed out, leaving many bag holders with massive losses.
The story became an international and political incident over the weekend when in the last couple of days, Milei deleted his original tweet, denied his endorsement and accused the political opposition of mischief. This eventually led to talks of his impeachment and created uncertainty in the Argentinian stock market. Then came an explosive twist to the story.
On Tuesday, CoinDesk broke the news that a key player behind the LIBRA token had bragged about buying access to Argentine President Javier Milei’s inner circle months before the memecoin’s scandalous launch and crash.
Although these kinds of kerfuffle for a memecoin are not unusual, how this happened and what followed after the apparent «rug pull» highlighted the risk of unchecked crypto trading and the potential for a reputational hit for the memecoin sector as a whole.
«The LIBRA episode represents what is a potential point of oversaturation for the memecoin space,» said Toronto-based crypto platform FRNT Financial. «At this point, the novelty of new projects, after TRUMP and MELANIA, and now LIBRA, has largely worn off.»
«Additionally, the reputational consequences for these assets may be significant. Having said that, it appears that this episode is likely to continue playing out as new details emerge. At this point, memecoins are synonymous with ‘pump and dump’ schemes,» FRNT contended.
This incident, along with other memecoin-related events that led to many retail traders losing money, may nudge the community to make more of an effort to police itself.
«The entire $LIBRA memecoin fiasco over the weekend should serve as a reminder that all of us in the DeFi community have a responsibility to make this space safer for users,» said Chris Chung, founder of Solana-based swap platform Titan.
How the ‘fiasco’ happened
The whole Milei and LIBRA episode played out within the span of a few days, starting on Feb. 14.
As explained by Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn, the token launched on that fateful day on a Solana-based DeX Meteora, with Milei’s initial post (now deleted) on social media platform X saying that the aim of the token was to help the growth of the Argentinian economy — a big endorsement for a memecoin.
Once the token price reached its peak of $4.4 billion within hours, the insiders started dumping their holdings immediately, making nearly $100 million, according to onchain analysts.
The next day, Milei deleted his original post, sending a shockwave within the memecoin community, that saw many similar tokens, such as TRUMP, MILANIA, and others, sell out fast. Meanwhile, Solana, the blockchain the token was built on, also saw its native token, SOL, fall.
In his new post, Milei claimed he wasn’t aware of the details of the project and accused the political opposition of mischief, making the situation a game of politics. By that time, the token had erased around $4.5 billion of retail capital in seven hours. Currently, the market cap sits around just above half a million, according to CoinMarketCap data.
The same day, names of a few key opinion leaders (KOL) came up, including Barstool’s Dave Portnoy, Threadguy, Hayden Davis and Faze Banks, who were involved in one way or another with the project. Portnoy said he was an early investor and was refunded his money, further spreading the controversy that insiders benefitted from the LIBRA fiasco. Davis, meanwhile, revealed that he was behind both the LIBRA and MELANIA memecoins and said the Argentinian token incident was «not a rug pull,» rather «It’s just a plan gone miserably wrong.»
The next day, the Argentinian opposition threatened Milei with impeachment over the incident. On Feb. 17, Ben Chow, co-founder of DeX Meteora, where LIBRA had launched, resigned over the controversy. Chow was also a co-founder of Solana-based trading aggregator Jupiter. The same day Argentina’s stock market collapsed almost 6% on a report of a probe on Milei.
Read more: LIBRA Apparent Rug Pull Is Latest ‘Sordid Episode’ Emerging From Solana’s Memecoin Complex: Galaxy
On Feb. 18, CoinDesk broke the news that Davis claimed in text messages that he could «control» Milei because of payments he had been making to Karina Milei, a powerful figure in Milei’s government, and the president’s sister.
‘Setback for crypto’
What will happen to Milei and all the involved parties is still unknown. However, if FTX’s spectacular blowout is anything to go by, there might still be a lot more to untangle in this story.
What it does highlight is that the memecoin drama that has become a game of split-second profit and losses, in this cycle, might be at a crossroads. As institutional investors are betting big on bitcoin and ether with the launch of exchange-traded funds, making those assets more TradFi friendly and stable, the memecoin sector has stuck out as the ugly duckling of the crypto space, and this incident may sour retail participation.
«Overall, this entire story is a real setback for the crypto space,» Chung said. «If we want to attract new retail users, this is not the way to do it.»
Uncategorized
Ether Supply Squeeze? Bybit Hacker Emerges as World’s 14th-Largest ETH Holder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/062d6/062d69cb25b8ec16ecdbc5a157bcd35313a82c24" alt=""
The Bybit hacker, supposedly a North Korean entity, is now one of the world’s largest ether holders, which may have bullish implications for the cryptocurrency’s spot price.
According to data from Arkham Intelligence and Coinbase executive Connor Grogan, this malicious actor holds 489,000 ETH, valued at approximately $1.34 billion, constituting about 0.4% of ether’s total supply, making it the 14th-largest Ether holder globally. That puts the hacker ahead of the Ethereum Foundation, Ethereum’s CEO Vitalik Buterin and Fidelity.
It’s important to note that the addresses linked to this entity are being closely monitored and backlisted by exchanges, which means the hacker will likely struggle to offload these coins in the market.
In simpler terms, the hacked ether supply is likely lost permanently. Furthermore, Bybit, which has reportedly secured a bridged loan from unnamed partners to cover nearly 80% of the ether lost in the Friday hack, will likely need to purchase coins in the market.
«As far as this supply is concerned, it’s essentially gone. No OTC desk or exchange will facilitate the movement of such a large amount. Meanwhile, Bybit is short 402k ETH. The bridge loan may cover immediate needs, but purchasing will still be necessary,» Vance Spencer, co-founder of the crypto VC firm Framework Ventures, said on X.
That probably explains why ether has bounced 2.6% to $2,730 from the overnight low of around $2,614. Funding rates in perpetual futures tied to ether remain positive, implying a bias for long positions, according to data source Coingecko.
Uncategorized
Crypto Exchanges Start to Fill Bybit’s $1.4B Hole as Hackers Move Stolen Funds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a5b/82a5b2580475210d5794b34f838ad97203f61d7f" alt=""
Crypto exchange Bitget has transferred 40,000 ether (ETH), worth $105 million, to Bybit, offering crucial support to its industry counterpart in the wake of the over billion-dollar hack suffered by the exchange.
The funds transferred are from Bitget’s own reserves, not user deposits, which remain securely stored on the platform and can be cross checked through the proof of reserves, the exchange’s CEO, Gracy Chen, said in a note shared with CoinDesk, while assuring more support if needed.
«At Bitget we strongly believe in supporting the community and everyone contributing towards the growth of crypto,» Chen said.
A suspected North Korean entity drained approximately $1.4 billion in ether from Bybit on Friday. The hack prompted an unprecedented wave of withdrawal requests from users, with the exchange successfully processing 99% of them, effectively facing a significant market stress test.
Part of the stolen funds started to move during Asian afternoon hours on Saturday with over 5,000 ETH moved through eXch mixer — a service that masks wallet address — before being sent to bridge protocol ChainFlip where the stash was converted to bitcoin (BTC).
In an X post, ChainFlip said it couldn’t block fund movements as it was a fully decentralized applications that relies on automated smart contracts, but that it had «turned off some frontend services to stop the flow.»
On the other hand, Bitget has blacklisted wallets tied to the hacker that drained ether worth millions from Bybit on Friday.
«We will block any transactions flowing in from illicit addresses to the exchange once it has been monitored. Our team of security, and researchers, are currently tracking these activities,» Chen said.
Despite the hack, Bybit had managed to process over 350,000 withdrawal requests and has since restored normal withdrawal operations, per an X post.
Uncategorized
Arthur Hayes Proposes Rolling Back Ethereum Network to Negate $1.4B Bybit Hack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a33/10a3333e47aae7e75366552bbdee0b40fe5de4f6" alt=""
Arthur Hayes, BitMEX co-founder and major ether (ETH) holder, asked Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin to rollback the network in order to assist hacked exchange Bybit, which lost nearly $1.4 billion in ether (ETH) on Friday.
«@VitalikButerin will you advocate to roll back the chain to help @Bybit_Official. My own view as a mega $ETH bag holder is $ETH stopped being money in 2016 after the DAO hack hardfork. If the community wanted to do it again, I would support it because we already voted no on immutability in 2016 [wh]y not do it again?» Hayes said on X.
Buterin was yet to reply as of time of publication.
The Bybit hack came into light on Friday when on-chain analyst ZachXBT noted suspicious outflows of over $1.4 billion from the exchange, with the attacker quickly swapping mETH and stETH for ether through a decentralized exchange.
The attacker then split 10,000 ETH to 39 different addresses and another 10,000 ETH to nine addresses, Gautham Santhosh, co-founder of Polynomial.fi, explained on X.
Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said that the hacker «took control of the specific ETH cold wallet and transferred all the ETH in the cold wallet to this unidentified address.» Zhou confirmed that the exchange «is solvent even if this hack loss is not recovered.»
One of the potential ways to address hacking is to roll back the blockchain. It involves reverting the blockchain to a state before the occurrence of a specific event, in this case, the hack. That way, malicious transactions resulting from the hack can be erased, effectively restoring lost or stolen funds. Implementing a rollback requires consensus from the network participants.
For instance, in 2016, the Ethereum network was rolled back using a hard fork to reverse a theft of $60 million in ether from The DAO (30% of all ETH in circulation back then). The hard fork split the chain into two – Ethereum and Ethereum Classic.
In 2019, Binance’s CEO Changpeng Zhao and his team considered pushing for a rollback on the Bitcoin network following a $40 million hack. However, the Bitcoin mining community criticized the idea of going back against the principle of decentralization and immutability, which are fundamental to blockchain technology.
Immutability is a security feature that prevents data from being changed after it’s added to the blockchain to make it trustworthy and tamper-proof. There are similar concerns regarding a potential Ethereum rollover.
«I wish we could roll back for the Bybit hack, I’m not against the idea. But the DAO hack was 15% of ETH with a clean recovery path. Today, a rollback would break bridges, stablecoins, L2s, RWAs and so much more. ETH ecosystem is just too interconnected now for a clean solution like 2016,» Santhosh said.
Sina 21st Capital explained that Ethereum is now stuck between a rock and a hard place.
«Ethereum is toast. They can roll back the chain and destroy what is left of the decentralization claim or allow North Korean baad actors to keep $1.4B of ETH and unleash an eternal internal battle. Either way, it is terrible,» Sina 21st Capital said on X.
Ether has dropped nearly 3% in 24 hours, but continues to trade rangebound between $2,600 and $2,800, CoinDesk data show.
-
Fashion4 месяца ago
These \’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Entertainment4 месяца ago
The final 6 \’Game of Thrones\’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Fashion4 месяца ago
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Sports4 месяца ago
Phillies\’ Aaron Altherr makes mind-boggling barehanded play
-
Entertainment4 месяца ago
The old and New Edition cast comes together to perform
-
Entertainment4 месяца ago
Disney\’s live-action Aladdin finally finds its stars
-
Business4 месяца ago
Uber and Lyft are finally available in all of New York State
-
Sports4 месяца ago
Steph Curry finally got the contract he deserves from the Warriors