Uncategorized
Gemini’s Tyler Winklevoss Says Trump CFTC Pick Quintenz Has ‘Disqualifying’ Views

Tyler Winklevoss, the CEO of crypto exchange Gemini, is at the center of a rift over support of President Donald Trump’s nominee to run the obscure-but-highly-relevant regulatory agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
He thinks former CFTC Commissioner Brian Quintenz is a bad choice, and he’s been talking with officials from the Trump administration about it, he told CoinDesk in an interview. That coincides with the White House slamming the brakes on a necessary step in Quintenz’s confirmation process in the Senate.
The administration didn’t give the Senate Agriculture Committee a full explanation when it halted Quintenz’s committee vote this week that would have advanced his approval to a final Senate floor vote. And the White House didn’t immediately respond to questions from CoinDesk about what’s getting in the way of the nominee, who until recently served as the regulatory chief for a16z crypto and is on the board of prediction-markets firm Kalshi, though the White House has reportedly continued to back the nomination.
«Many in our industry have significant concerns about this nomination,» Winklevoss told CoinDesk. «Mr. Quintenz is not aligned with the president’s stated agenda and objectives.»
Read More: Quintenz, Trump’s Pick as Potential U.S. Crypto Watchdog, Delayed by White House
Winklevoss and his twin brother, Cameron, fellow co-founder of Gemini and other shared business interests, are among the prominent crypto insiders who’ve occupied a front seat — literally — in the White House’s recent campaign to elevate the U.S. digital assets industry. When Trump hosted a White House crypto summit, the brothers were seated among the primary guests. And when the president signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law, they were sitting in the front row beside other prominent figures, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Tether CEO Paulo Ardoino.
Trump even mentioned the brothers in his remarks about the first big crypto legislative win. So they’ve come to occupy a prominent place in the president’s view of the crypto industry, raising questions about whether Gemini can get Quintenz booted from consideration.
At this late stage in the confirmation process, a significant delay or starting over could weigh on the industry’s policy priorities. While the CFTC may largely be invisible to the U.S. public, its importance for the crypto space has been sharply rising as lawmakers in Congress get closer to passing legislation that would set up crypto markets regulation in the U.S. But Tyler Winklevoss argued it would be a mistake to put Quintenz in charge.
The Gemini CEO contends that Quintenz has the wrong views on protecting developers, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), federal spending and is raising ethical red flags with reported communications he’s made on behalf of the company he serves as a board member, Kalshi.
Developer liability
«Quintenz supports prosecuting smart contract developers,» Winklevoss said, calling it a «disqualifying position.»
«Smart contract developers need to be protected in order for innovation to flourish and to realize President Trump’s vision of making America the crypto capital of the world,» he said.
In October 2018, then-Commissioner Quintenz gave a speech on smart contracts, saying that a developer should potentially be seen as legally liable if they could recognize their work would be used to skirt government regulations. With Roman Storm, a developer behind Tornado Cash, currently awaiting his jury verdict in a U.S. criminal trial, the question of a software developer’s liability is at the forefront.
The industry has a strong take on this matter, arguing that creators shouldn’t be punished for how their creations are used. In much the same way that manufacturers of cars and firearms communication technologies aren’t pursued by criminal prosecution for how their products are used by bad actors, the sector argues that digital assets innovators similarly shouldn’t be on the hook for how their platforms and tools are utilized downstream, as long as the products are not actively managed by those who wrote the code.
The industry position seems to fall in line with a speech Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins gave on Thursday to announce his agency’s «Project Crypto,» in which one of its effort will be «protecting pure publishers of software code.»
Kalshi
In his objections to Quintenz, Winklevoss also flagged recent reports on the former commissioner’s communications with the CFTC as a private citizen, as he allegedly sought information on the competitors to prediction market platform Kalshi, where he serves on the board of directors.
Winklevoss said recent revelations of emails sought under the Freedom of Information Act, in which Quintenz and an associate seem to have requested insight into the agency’s work and deliberations on Kalshi rivals, «raise serious questions.»
The CFTC has waged a longstanding battle over regulation of the prediction markets. The position of the previous leadership under Chairman Rostin Behnam was that the activity should be regulated as gambling, and he had concerns over the agency policing political elections — one of the high-profile arenas of prediction betting. Behnam’s agency fought the industry in court, including Kalshi, though it recently abandoned that dispute.
While CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline Pham has argued the agency took the wrong path, she said it’s difficult to reverse its position on event contracts, which she characterized as «a sinkhole of legal uncertainty and an inappropriate constraint on the new administration.»
CFTC funding
Winklevoss also raised issue with Quintenz’s remarks on the likely need of more money and resources at the CFTC as it takes on oversight of a swath of U.S. crypto activity.
«The Trump Administration wants to cut red tape and deregulate,» Winklevoss said. «This nominee continues to advocate for dramatically increasing budgets and overregulation that will lead to regulatory capture.»
In his Senate confirmation hearing, Quintenz suggested a significant budget boost will probably be needed if the CFTC is eventually tasked as the leading federal regulator for the crypto markets.
However, the question of funding has long been central to discussions on crypto legislation to overhaul CFTC authority. Republicans have routinely acknowledged that the agency is likely to seek more resources to allow it to oversee a broad new area of the financial sector and — for the first time — actively regulate a spot market, meaning a market where actual assets are traded, such as bitcoin (BTC).
When asked about it in a CoinDesk TV interview this week, top Trump crypto adviser Bo Hines granted that the agency may need more resources.
«Congress is well aware that the CFTC might require some additional labor, but I think that’s something that we can easily get done through legislation,» Hines said.
CBDCs
The Gemini co-founder also interpreted some of Quintenz’s past comments on central-bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as being open to discussion on a U.S. version — a possibility that’s treated as toxic by Republican politicians and most of the crypto industry. But Quintenz’s remarks in 2020 were relatively superficial, suggesting that it’d be important that the CFTC «stays abreast of legal and regulatory questions» around the government tokens, which he described in public remarks as an «area of particular interest to me.»
Even an interest should be disqualifying, Winklevoss contends.
«You should not be interested in CBDCs or entertaining that kind of totalitarian technology,» he said. «That in itself is disqualifying and against everything our industry stands for.»
From congressional candidates up to Trump, Republican lawmakers have painted the concept of CBDCs as a government campaign to seek control and surveillance over citizens’ finances. But the idea never progressed further than a discussion point with some Democratic lawmakers and a topic of technical study among regulators and has never risen to an active project in the U.S., as China and Europe moved to implement government-backed digital currencies.
Federal Reserve officials, including Chair Jerome Powell, had routinely said they wouldn’t act without Congress and the White House, and if the central bank were ever to issue a digital dollar, the officials said transactions should be managed by U.S. banks and not the government.
CFTC leadership vacuum
The pause in Quintenz’s confirmation process has thrown up some significant questions about the future leadership of the CFTC. The five-member commission currently has only two members — one from each party — and both of them have said they’re leaving soon. That could potentially leave a freshly confirmed chairman alone atop the agency.
But if Quintenz’s nomination is abandoned or significantly delayed, people familiar with Acting Chairman Pham’s plans suggest she’s eager to move on, potentially in the coming weeks. If she can’t stay to chair the commission, it raises questions about what happens next — whether President Trump would be under pressure to shove the Democratic commissioner, Kristin Johnson, out of the CFTC, so the agency wouldn’t be taken over by a Democrat’s agenda, and how long the CFTC may be without an official chairman.
The Senate is heading into its August recess, leaving its Washington work behind for a while. Even if things get back on track, his final confirmation vote by the overall Senate could be further delayed.
If Quintenz does continue through the process and become chairman, some legal experts have cast doubt on the strength of policymaking from a single commissioner on what’s meant to be a five-member group.
«I think when looking at the quorum rules, the agency can still act,» former CFTC Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero told CoinDesk TV in a Thursday interview with Jennifer Sanasie. «But is that the best way to act?»
She suggested the potential investors in the space — including from traditional financial institutions — «they are all going to want some certainty.» And that can be provided, she said, by the White House nominating more names and getting a full commission confirmed by the Senate, «but we haven’t seen that, yet.»
When questioned about the value of having both parties represented on the commission during his confirmation hearing, Quintenz declined to second-guess Trump’s nomination process.
«The president is the head of the executive, and the president will make his own decisions,» he said.
Uncategorized
XLM Sees Heavy Volatility as Institutional Selling Weighs on Price

Stellar’s XLM token endured sharp swings over the past 24 hours, tumbling 3% as institutional selling pressure dominated order books. The asset declined from $0.39 to $0.38 between September 14 at 15:00 and September 15 at 14:00, with trading volumes peaking at 101.32 million—nearly triple its 24-hour average. The heaviest liquidation struck during the morning hours of September 15, when XLM collapsed from $0.395 to $0.376 within two hours, establishing $0.395 as firm resistance while tentative support formed near $0.375.
Despite the broader downtrend, intraday action highlighted moments of resilience. From 13:15 to 14:14 on September 15, XLM staged a brief recovery, jumping from $0.378 to a session high of $0.383 before closing the hour at $0.380. Trading volume surged above 10 million units during this window, with 3.45 million changing hands in a single minute as bulls attempted to push past resistance. While sellers capped momentum, the consolidation zone around $0.380–$0.381 now represents a potential support base.
Market dynamics suggest distribution patterns consistent with institutional profit-taking. The persistent supply overhead has reinforced resistance at $0.395, where repeated rally attempts have failed, while the emergence of support near $0.375 reflects opportunistic buying during liquidation waves. For traders, the $0.375–$0.395 band has become the key battleground that will define near-term direction.
Technical Indicators
- XLM retreated 3% from $0.39 to $0.38 during the previous 24-hours from 14 September 15:00 to 15 September 14:00.
- Trading volume peaked at 101.32 million during the 08:00 hour, nearly triple the 24-hour average of 24.47 million.
- Strong resistance established around $0.395 level during morning selloff.
- Key support emerged near $0.375 where buying interest materialized.
- Price range of $0.019 representing 5% volatility between peak and trough.
- Recovery attempts reached $0.383 by 13:00 before encountering selling pressure.
- Consolidation pattern formed around $0.380-$0.381 zone suggesting new support level.
Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.
Uncategorized
HBAR Tumbles 5% as Institutional Investors Trigger Mass Selloff

Hedera Hashgraph’s HBAR token endured steep losses over a volatile 24-hour window between September 14 and 15, falling 5% from $0.24 to $0.23. The token’s trading range expanded by $0.01 — a move often linked to outsized institutional activity — as heavy corporate selling overwhelmed support levels. The sharpest move came between 07:00 and 08:00 UTC on September 15, when concentrated liquidation drove prices lower after days of resistance around $0.24.
Institutional trading volumes surged during the session, with more than 126 million tokens changing hands on the morning of September 15 — nearly three times the norm for corporate flows. Market participants attributed the spike to portfolio rebalancing by large stakeholders, with enterprise adoption jitters and mounting regulatory scrutiny providing the backdrop for the selloff.
Recovery efforts briefly emerged during the final hour of trading, when corporate buyers tested the $0.24 level before retreating. Between 13:32 and 13:35 UTC, one accumulation push saw 2.47 million tokens deployed in an effort to establish a price floor. Still, buying momentum ultimately faltered, with HBAR settling back into support at $0.23.
The turbulence underscores the token’s vulnerability to institutional distribution events. Analysts point to the failed breakout above $0.24 as confirmation of fresh resistance, with $0.23 now serving as the critical support zone. The surge in volume suggests major corporate participants are repositioning ahead of regulatory shifts, leaving HBAR’s near-term outlook dependent on whether enterprise buyers can mount sustained defenses above key support.
Technical Indicators Summary
- Corporate resistance levels crystallized at $0.24 where institutional selling pressure consistently overwhelmed enterprise buying interest across multiple trading sessions.
- Institutional support structures emerged around $0.23 levels where corporate buying programs have systematically absorbed selling pressure from retail and smaller institutional participants.
- The unprecedented trading volume surge to 126.38 million tokens during the 08:00 morning session reflects enterprise-scale distribution strategies that overwhelmed corporate demand across major trading platforms.
- Subsequent institutional momentum proved unsustainable as systematic selling pressure resumed between 13:37-13:44, driving corporate participants back toward $0.23 support zones with sustained volumes exceeding 1 million tokens, indicating ongoing institutional distribution.
- Final trading periods exhibited diminishing corporate activity with zero recorded volume between 13:13-14:14, suggesting institutional participants adopted defensive positioning strategies as HBAR consolidated at $0.23 amid enterprise uncertainty.
Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.
Uncategorized
Dogecoin Inches Closer to Wall Street With First Meme Coin ETF

The first exchange-traded fund (ETF) built around a meme coin could hit the market this week, after multiple delays and much speculation.
The DOGE ETF — formally called the Rex Shares-Osprey Dogecoin ETF (DOJE) — was originally slated to debut last week, alongside a handful of politically themed and crypto-related ETFs. Those included funds tied to Bonk (BONK), XRP, Bitcoin (BTC) and even a Trump-themed fund. But DOJE’s debut never materialized.
Now, Bloomberg ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart believe Wednesday is the most likely launch date, though they caution nothing is certain.
“It’s more likely than not,” Seyffart said. “That seems like the base case.”
Ahead of the introduction of the ETF, DOGE has been among the top performers over the past month, ahead 15% even including a decline of 3.5% over the past 24 horus.
If launched, DOJE would mark a milestone as the first U.S. ETF to focus on a meme coin — cryptocurrencies that generally lack utility or a clear economic purpose. These include tokens like Dogecoin, Shiba Inu (SHIB) and Bonk, which often surge in popularity thanks to internet culture, celebrity endorsements and speculative trading.
Balchunas described DOJE’s significance in a post on X: “First-ever US ETF to hold something that has no utility on purpose.”
DOJE is not a spot ETF. That means it won’t hold DOGE directly. Instead, the fund will use a Cayman Islands-based subsidiary to gain exposure through futures and other derivatives. This approach sidesteps the need for physical custody of the coin while still offering traders a way to bet on its performance within a traditional brokerage account.
The ETF was approved earlier this month under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which is typically used for mutual funds and diversified ETFs. That sets it apart from the wave of bitcoin ETFs that received green lights under the Securities Act of 1933, a framework used for commodity-based and asset-backed products. In short, DOJE is structured more like a mutual fund than a commodity trust.
More direct exposure may be coming soon. Several firms have filed applications to launch spot DOGE ETFs, which would hold the meme coin itself rather than derivatives. These applications are still under review by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has grown more comfortable with crypto ETFs since approving a slate of bitcoin products in early 2024.
The broader crypto market has shown that investor demand can outweigh fundamental critiques. Meme coins have long drawn skepticism for having no underlying value or use case, but that hasn’t kept them from drawing billions in speculative capital.
Seyffart said the ETF market is likely to follow the same path. “There’s going to be a bunch of products like this, whether you love it or need it, they’re going to be coming to market,” he said.
He added that many existing financial products serve no deeper purpose than providing a vehicle for short-term bets. “There’s plenty of products out there that are just being used as gambling or short-term trading,” he said. “So if there’s an audience for this in the crypto world, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if this finds an audience in the ETF and TradFi world.”
Whether the DOJE ETF opens the door to more meme coin funds — or just proves the concept is viable — may depend on how the market responds this week. Either way, it signals a new phase in the merging of internet culture and traditional finance.
-
Business11 месяцев ago
3 Ways to make your business presentation more relatable
-
Fashion11 месяцев ago
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Entertainment11 месяцев ago
10 Artists who retired from music and made a comeback
-
Entertainment11 месяцев ago
\’Better Call Saul\’ has been renewed for a fourth season
-
Entertainment11 месяцев ago
New Season 8 Walking Dead trailer flashes forward in time
-
Business11 месяцев ago
15 Habits that could be hurting your business relationships
-
Entertainment11 месяцев ago
Meet Superman\’s grandfather in new trailer for Krypton
-
Entertainment11 месяцев ago
Disney\’s live-action Aladdin finally finds its stars